Hard to do better than this deal.
Plus, beer!

http://www.newbelgium.com/trade

Follow this topic in the R3 Forum here!

Related posts:

1. more "motor" bikes, for sight (and the rest of you, too)
2. charlie kelley’s wierd bikes collection
3. thoughts on folding bikes

This is from an awesome series of propaganda-esque images done for the Race to Replace marketing campaign that followed Lance’s [first] retirement. The rest can be found below. I loved this one in particular because Georgie has spent his whole career working hard for others, and deserves some kudos for his sacrifice and general awesomeness. Plus, he’s survived like 33 stem shatters…

http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/chicken_st … 2/sizes/o/

Follow this topic in the R3 Forum here!

Related posts:

1. Cycle Chic Sundays are Go
2. Photojojo’s Helmet Cam Mount
3. macaframa/raleigh/giant FTW

the president is in the news today, catching flack (as presidents do) for riding his bicycle with his family, while not wearing a helmet. it made me think that we’ve never really delved into the subject here on the forum, merely bantered about it in jest, or preached. i preach all the time that people should wear helmets, despite NOT wearing one for the majority of my first 15 years of cycling. so i figured fuck it. let’s do this!

: : :

much debate occurs over the use of bicycle helmets. both of the go-to cyclists on this forum (me and WR) wear them more or less religiously and also actively advocate their use to others. where we, and others, begin to differ is in whether or not the other side of the argument is valid.

personally, i think it all comes down to how you’re looking at it. what IS the debate? is the debate rooted in whether or not a helmet will help you survive a crash? i don’t think there’s much questioning that — a helmet is far more likely to protect your noggin when your noggin tries to make sweet sweet love to the street. i think you’ll even find most staunch ANTI-helmet endorsees to agree with that.

i think additionally, there’s the whole "you’ll be glad you have it when you need it" feeling. that also i think you’ll find damn near everyone to agree with. if you go down and suffer a concussion or other brain trauma cause you weren’t wearing a bucket on your egg, you’re probably gonna wish you had been.

and let’s not forget the "i have things to LIVE FOR!" side of it. there’s a memorable scene in the almost universally helmet-less "MASH" where an OG SF messenger talks a bit about how he didn’t wear a helmet for 15 years, but now he has a kid, so he’s riding helmeted the majority of the time. (not on camera though, of course, hahaha!!!)

ok, so we can all agree that in the instance of a crash where your head hits the ground, a helmet is going to help in one way or the other, even if it just keeps you from getting a strawberry under your sideburns.

but let’s move away from that for a minute and look at the other big part of the helmet debate. does wearing a helmet prevent ACCIDENTS? not INJURIES. accidents. well, see on this one is where most helmet advocates have their turn at letting go a bit. to me personally, i say definitively … NO. a helmet does not in any way prevent accidents. in fact, some would say … wait for it … helmets may actually CAUSE accidents.

madness, you say, and i agree that it sounds that way. but first let’s look at a good little factoid from an amazing 2001 NYT ARTICLE…

"The number of head injuries has increased 10 percent since 1991, even as bicycle helmet use has risen sharply, according to figures compiled by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. But given that ridership has declined over the same period, the rate of head injuries per active cyclist has increased 51 percent just as bicycle helmets have become widespread."

wait, WHAT? between ’91 and ’01, ridership DEcreased, helmet use INcreased, and yet there were MORE cycling head injuries? how the fuck is that?

well, the possibility of selective percentages notwithstanding, i think that it comes down to PERCEIVED safety. consider the "superman complex." (i made that up — good shit, right?) some risk analysts would argue that when you feel safer, you try crazier shit. and when you try crazier shit, you get FUCKED UP. this i can even tell you from personal experience. in my BMX days, i tried WAY more insane-o shit when i was under a helmet than when i wasn’t. in fact, every significant cycling injury i’ve EVER sustained was while i was wearing a helmet. coincidence, probably, but still. personally, for me only, i feel safer when i wear a helmet, so i’m more likely to go fast, to drink and ride (not anymore), to squeak myself into positions that are FAR more dangerous, and to generally just not worry about injury so much. so i can see the validity there.

another random little factoid i found was this, which has nothing to do with either the cyclist OR the helmet…

"Drivers pass closer when overtaking cyclists wearing helmets than when overtaking bare-headed cyclists, increasing the risk of a collision…"

that comes from doctor ian walker, a traffic psychologist (???) from the university of bath, who in 2006 used a bicycle fitted with a computer and an ultrasonic distance sensor to record data from over 2,500 overtaking motorists in salisbury and bristol, UK. he found that drivers were as much as twice as likely to get particularly close to the bicycle when he was wearing a helmet. in fact, he was hit TWICE in the course of his EXPERIMENT, and each time was while wearing a helmet.

so that’s three different parts of the debate — helmets DO prevent injury, do NOT prevent accidents, and drivers are a factor as well. there’s also the sub-issue of people who don’t wear their helmet properly (not tight enough or not positioned on the head correctly), and extraneous random shit — what i like to call "the million dollar baby syndrome." in other words, sometimes no matter WHAT precautions you take — you’re fucked.

in the end, the only true measure of your safety on a bicycle is by practicing safe cycling techniques. staying visible, following the rules, and generally watching out for your own ass. THAT’S what’s gonna keep you intact. don’t be an idiot, learn to control your bike, and STAY AWARE.

look, in the end, whatever you choose to do is what’s right for you. don’t wanna wear a helmet? fuck if i care, don’t. wanna wear a helmet? do it, i do. but the debate’s starting point(s) and underpinnings are what’s really the issue here. there’s undeniable facts on either side of the argument, and different strokes work for different spokes. (nyuk, nyuk.)

discuss!

Follow this topic in the R3 Forum here!

Related posts:

1. ironLung fave music video of the moment
2. what NOT to buy the cyclist in your life
3. awesome UV editor’s statement re: helmets

Leading by example is leading by example.
This is not leading by example.

http://www.kansascity.com/stargazing/story/1409788.html

Follow this topic in the R3 Forum here!

Related posts:

1. barack obama rides his bicycle (not political)
2. arrested milwaukee bike polo crew wins BIG
3. Honorary Team Lope Member: Mr. Jalopy

Another hot shot from DustinJ. His Flickr stream is a necessary link.
From the Bike Away From Work Fashion Show in SF. This here is the kind of sight that would cause me to crash. Alone. No obstacles. Face plant.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/edmdusty/3537737624/

Full shot:

Follow this topic in the R3 Forum here!

Related posts:

1. Team Lope Bike Grrls: DJ Luke Stein’s Set
2. Team Lope Bike Grrls – Gaby [NSFW]
3. Team Lope Bike Grrls — Rocky

The Derailleurs are in town, I believe for the CM tonight, which I will again miss. However, I was pleased to note that the current line-up is quite aesthetically pleasing, in other words, fly.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/edmdusty/3618210701/ from DustinJ

Follow this topic in the R3 Forum here!

Related posts:

1. Team Lope Bike Grrls – XtraCycle Business Cutie
2. team lope bike grrls — nicole lee
3. Team Lope Bike Grrls: DJ Luke Stein’s Set

bikes, GERMAN HIPHOP, and grrls on lowrider bicycle bicycles at 1:23.

you’re also gonna wanna see 3:15.

Follow this topic in the R3 Forum here!

Related posts:

1. THE HEEEEELMET DEBAAAATE (insert creepy music)
2. Ironlung Draws a Bike
3. bicycle crash test – 3 of the greatest seconds of video EVER

We’ve noted her nice leg used in a wheelset ad previously, but now that IminusD out of San Jose has their site up, we can also admire how she trues a wheel and how she examines available stock for Quality Control purposes.

Nice work!

http://iminusd.com/

Follow this topic in the R3 Forum here!

Related posts:

1. Team Lope Bike Grrls: TinaBalls Tricky
2. Team Lope Bike Grrls — Rocky
3. team lope bike grrls — nicole lee

Hint: It’s the secret of the Universe.

http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/08/2 … .html#more

Follow this topic in the R3 Forum here!

Related posts:

1. Another Brass Knuckle Bar Scheme
2. QWERTY Grips
3. Wrong: Custom Bike-Mowers

ok, THIS is the most overwrought piece of garmentry i’ve ever seen in my life. and that comes from a guy who used to be married to someone who wore a skirt over top of pants. so i know what i’m sayin here.

the osloh is another urban cycling pant, a "commuter pant," if you will, and it actually starts off sounding pretty good…

> 12 oz. premium stretch denim 98% cotton, 2% spandex
> coated with water repellant resin and anti-bacterial finish
> low front waistband
> higher back waistband
> relaxed fit through the hip and thighs

but those things are pretty common in urban cycling pants, especially cycling knickers. so how to differentiate these from the rest of the pack?

MAKE THEM FAIL.

first of all, the leg cuff…

ok, great, so it has some velcro straps to peg your chainSide pantleg so it doesn’t get ate or greazy. great. that’s actually very useful. except for where this method restricts the flexure of your calf muscles, keeps you WAY too warm, and the lower strap is still too high to keep your pantleg from entering the sprocket! and don’t forget that when it’s NOT activateds, you have two fucking velcro straps just hanging off the side of your leg with no use.

but you know what, that might actually be kind of helpful to some people, so let’s move on to the lock holster. why in heaven’s fucking name would you make a lock holster which you have to unlock your lock to use?

i mean, really? i suppose if you’re pulling your lock out or putting it back, it’s going to be open anyway, but really? you have to find the loops, insert your lock through them, AND THEN LOCK IT BEHIND YOUR BACK. did they do this so that the pocket under it was still accessible? yeah? oh, great, then HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO ACCESS IT WITH A FUCKING LOCK IN FRONT OF IT?

worst.
pant.
EVER.

Follow this topic in the R3 Forum here!

Related posts:

1. cycling clothing win of the day – novara liners
2. NOS adidas eddy merckx cycling shoes
3. SWRVE cycling jeans

Less Current »